ffi |
fl |
5m |
4m |
’ |
k |
e |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
$ |
@ |
# |
Æ |
Π|
æ |
œ |
|||||
j |
b |
c |
d |
i |
s |
f |
g |
ff |
9 |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
||||||||||
? |
fi |
0 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
H |
I |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earlier topic: The little printer-Toy
Mohawk 50/10
Someone recently sent me an email via Briar from a post I made here recommending Mohawk 50/10 Ultra as a good letterpress reproduction paper. Unfortunately I lost the email, so hopefully this will suffice.
Their problem was with Mohawk 50/10 Matte not printing well digitally. Well, the Matte is a new formulation of the old Ultra, which was a reformulation of the old Plus.
I don’t know about letterpress reproduction using the Matte, but yes, it does seem to be problematic with digital work. I seem to get a lot of toner scatter. Just when you think you have found the Holy Grail, they go and mess with it.
Gerald
http://BielerPress.blogspot.com
Log in to reply